Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.unad.edu.co/handle/10596/29572Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Salas-Zapata, Walter Alfredo | - |
| dc.creator | Ríos-Osorio, Leonardo Alberto | - |
| dc.date | 2013-01-15 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-08T21:22:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-11-08T21:22:14Z | - |
| dc.identifier | http://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/index.php/riaa/article/view/987 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.22490/21456453.987 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.unad.edu.co/handle/10596/29572 | - |
| dc.description | The transition toward sustainability is the set of changes and decisions a group of people make in order to resolve problems of sustainability. To address these problems a scientific trend has emerged called sustainability science, which has been considered to be a science inspired by the use of knowledge and must have characteristics such as transdisciplinarity, participation, social learning, coproduction of knowledge, as well as consider multiple perspectives and scales of problems and the uncertainty inherent to them. However, scientific research plays a particularly important role in the decision making processes. The chances of success greatly increase when permits interaction and communication between researchers and decision makers, or other actor. This paper analyzes how the characteristics in question contribute to the promotion of changes toward sustainability. | en-US |
| dc.description | La transición hacia la sostenibilidad es el conjunto de cambios y decisiones que toma un grupo humano para resolver problemas de insostenibilidad. Para encarar estos problemas ha surgido una tendencia científica denominada ciencia de la sostenibilidad, la cual se ha considerado que debe ser una ciencia inspirada en el uso del conocimiento y debe tener características como la transdisciplinariedad, la participación, el aprendizaje social, la co-producción de conocimiento, la visualización de múltiples escalas y el manejo de la incertidumbre. No obstante, la investigación científica excepcionalmente permea procesos de toma de decisiones. Las posibilidades de lograrlo mejoran cuando las investigaciones posibilitan la relación y comunicación entre investigadores y tomadores de decisiones u otros actores. Este artículo analiza de qué manera las características en mención contribuyen a que las investigaciones en sostenibilidad promuevan transiciones hacia la sostenibilidad. | es-ES |
| dc.description | A transicao para a sustentabilidade e o conjunto de mudancas e decisoes de um grupo humano para resolver os problemas da insustentabilidade. Para resolver esses problemas surgiu uma tendencia cientifica chamada ciencia da sustentabilidade, a qual e considerada uma ciencia inspirada no uso do conhecimento e deve ter características como a transdisciplinaridade, a participacao, a aprendizagem social, a coproducao de conhecimento, a visualizacao multiescala e manejo de incerteza. No entanto, a pesquisa cientifica excepcionalmente permeia os processos de tomada de decisao. As possibilidades de sucesso melhoram quando as pesquisas permitem o relacionamento e a comunicacao entre pesquisadores e tomadores de decisao e outros atores. Este artigo analisa como as caracteristicas em questao contribuem para que as investigacoes de sustentabilidade promovam as transicoes para a sustentabilidade. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, UNAD | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/index.php/riaa/article/view/987/973 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Almeida, C., & Bascolo, E. (2006). Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 22: (S7-19) (S20-33). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Introduction. In F. J. C. C. F. Berkes (Ed.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boulanger, P., & Brechet, T. (2005). Models for policymaking in sustainable development: The state of the art and perspectives for research. Ecological Economics, 55(3): 337-350. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Clark, W., & Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS, 100 (14): 8059 - 8061. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Espinosa, A., Harnden, R., & Walker, J. (2008). A complexity approach to sustainability – Stafford Beer revisited. European Journal Of Operational Research, 187 (2): 636-651. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fafard, P. (2008). Evidence and Healthy Public Policy: Insights from Health and Political Sciences (Vol. Mayo). Quebec: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 2 (2): 14 - 21. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems. Global Environ Chang, 16 (3): 253 - 267. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the postnormal age. Futures, 25 (7): 739-755. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gallopin, G. (2004). Sustainable development: epistemological challenges to science and technology. Paper presented at the Workshop on Sustainable Development: Epistemological Challenges to Science and Technology, Santiago de Chile. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gallopín, G. (2001, December). Science and technology, sustainability and sustainable development. (LC/R.2081/I). ECLAC. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gómez-Arias, R., Orozco, D., Rodríguez, F., & Velasquez, W. (2006). Políticas públicas en salud: relación entre investigación y decisión. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública, 24 (2): 105-118. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Grosskurth, J. (2007). Ambition and reality in modeling: a case study on public planning for regional sustainability. Sustainability Sci Practice Policy, 3 (1): 3-11. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hertin, J., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., & Nykvist, B. (2009). Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process. Environment and Planning, 41 (5): 1185-1200. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hirsch, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60 (1): 119-128. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Holling, C. (1996). Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystem, and incentives for people. Ecol Appl, 3: 733-735. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Holling, C. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4: 390 - 405. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3 (2): 215-239. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., . . . Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292 (5517): 641-642. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 3 (2): 5-14. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Komiyama, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1 (1): 1-6. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Luks, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance. Ecological Economics, 63 (2-3): 418-426. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustainability Sci Practice Policy, 2 (1): 36 - 41. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). Los límites del crecimiento (Vol. Primera). Nueva York: Fondo de Cultura Económica. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Norberg, J., & Cumming, G. (2008). Introduction. In J. Norberg & G. Cumming (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 1-14). New York: Columbia University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Novo, M. (2006). El desarrollo sostenible. Su dimensión ambiental y educativa (First ed.). Madrid: Pearson-Prentice Hall. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rapport, D. (2007). Sustainability science: an ecolhealth perspective. Sustainability Science, 2 (1): 77-84. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ravetz, J. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions toward sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3 (4): 275 - 284. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rios, L., Ortiz, M., & Álvarez, X. (2009). An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16 (1): 48-60. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Torgerson, D. (2003). Entre el conocimiento y la política: tres caras del análisis de política [1986]. In L. Aguilar (Ed.), El estudio de las políticas (pp. 197-238). México D.F.: Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa | - |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2013 Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental (RIAA) | es-ES |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental; Vol. 4, Núm. 1 (2013); 101-111 | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental; Vol. 4, Núm. 1 (2013); 101-111 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2145-6453 | - |
| dc.source | 2145-6097 | - |
| dc.subject | methodology; participation; policies; sustainability; transdisciplinarity. | en-US |
| dc.subject | metodología; participación; políticas; sostenibilidad; transdisciplinariedad. | es-ES |
| dc.subject | metodologia; participacao; politica; sustentabilidade; transdisciplinaridade. | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Sustainability science, its methodological characteristics and reach in decision-making processes | en-US |
| dc.title | Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones | es-ES |
| dc.title | Ciência da sustentabilidade, suas características metodológicas e alcance nos processos de tomada de decisão | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Revista RIAA | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.